Financial Statement Issues
For the Year Ended December 31, 2010
Issue 1
The closing of the
A conclusion can be
reached that the actions of the MRMC’s Board of Governors did not protect the
interest of the 13 communities serviced by the
The MRMC Federal Tax
Return 990 for the year 2010 now changes the mission statement which reads:
“
Not only was the
mission statement changed, it appears that Solaris Health Systems, the
Muhlenberg Regional Medical Center and/
or the Muhlenberg Foundation did not notify the New Jersey Attorney General or
the Surrogate Court of the hospital’s closing and seek direction(s) as to the
disposition of its many assets. A cy pres proceeding before the courts may have
been warranted.
MRMC December 31,
2010 Financial Statements – page 6 paragraph 1
Notes to Financial
Statements
December 31, 2010 and
2009
1. Organizational
Structure and Nature of Operations
Muhlenberg Regional
Medical Center, Inc. (“MRMC”) is a not-for-profit, controlled entity of Solaris
Health System, Inc. (“Solaris”).
MRMC was a 355-bed
acute care medical center located in
On February 21, 2008,
the Solaris Board of Directors voted to immediately authorize the filing of a
certificate of need (“CON”) application to close MRMC. The CON application was
approved on July 29, 2008 and MRMC was closed on August 13, 2008, without a
needs assessment or impact study ever being done, which was required by the
state.
Issue 2
On the 2008
Muhlenberg Hospital Form 990, the Statement of Program Service Accomplishments
indicated that the two main sources of revenue were from the
Thus, it appears $1
million in net profits from the
MRMC December 31,
2010 Financial Statements – page 6 paragraph 1
Notes to Financial
Statements
December 31, 2010 and
2009
Organizational
Structure and Nature of Operations
“The Community
Hospital Group, Inc .d/b/a
Issue 3
A review of the
In 2008, the Home
Health Care profit was $2,001,864 ($7,093,553 less expenses of $5,091,689).
In 2010 a 50%
interest in the Muhlenberg Home Health Care was sold to Meridian Health.
Meridian At Home formed a new affiliate corporation called JFK Home At Home to
operate the Muhlenberg Home Healthcare. It appears that this transaction will
leave MRMC with very little operating income.
Was this transaction
completed unilaterally without the approval of the New Jersey Attorney General?
Issue 4
MRMC December 31,
2010 Financial Statements – page 6 paragraph 2
Notes to Financial
Statements
December 31, 2010 and
2009
Organizational Structure
and Nature of Operations
“On December 31,
2010, MRMC formed a joint venture with Meridian Healthcare to establish the new
organization, JFK Meridian Home Care Services LLC d/b/a JFK at Home. JFK at
Home is a Home Health Care provider. The operations of Muhlenberg’s Home Care
Department ceased as of that date. In connection with the formation of the
joint venture, MRMC transferred property and equipment at its carrying value of
approximately $258,000 to the joint venture for 50% ownership in the joint
venture for $5,000,000, and a gain on sale of the Home Care business of
$4,619,185, net of closing costs, was recorded in the consolidated statement of
operations as of December 31, 2010. The investment in the joint venture is
accounted for on the equity method of accounting and included in other assets
on the consolidated balance sheet.”
Was this transaction
completed unilaterally without the approval of the New Jersey Attorney General?
Issue 5
In 2007, the
Muhlenberg Foundation made payments to the
The purpose of this
transaction needs to be questioned. Was it done in good faith? Why was Midtown
Shops stock transferred from the Muhlenberg Foundation to the
MRMC December 31,
2010 Financial Statements
Notes to Financial
Statements
December 31, 2010 and
2009
Financial Statements
– page 34 – last paragraph
“21. Subsequent Event
Subsequent to
December 31, 2010, an offer was made to purchase Midtown Shops. As of the date
of the report, the sale was still pending.”
***According to land
records in Union County, New Jersey, on 06/28/2011, Deed Book 5867, page 0607,
a deed was recorded which transferred ownership of Midtown Shops, Inc., real
estate property in the amount of Four Million Ten Thousand Dollars
($4,010,000.00).***
Issue 6
Are Beneficial
Interest in Perpetual Trusts and Endowments protected? Based on the Financial
report statement, it appears that theses Trusts and endowments are being
handled correctly. However, the Attorney should be informed of any material
changes to the Trusts and Endowments.
MRMC December 31,
2010 Financial Statements
Notes to Financial
Statements
December 31, 2010 and
2009
Financial Statements
– page 29
14. Temporarily and Permanently Restricted Net
Assets
Temporarily restricted net assets are related to, or restricted for, the
following:
2010 2009
Assets
held for betterments to plant facilities and
Purchases
of equipment $ 243,516 $ 196,728
Beneficial
interest in temporarily restricted net assets
of
the Muhlenberg Foundation 5,802,381 5,842,547
Total
$ 6,045,897 $6,039,275
Permanently restricted net assets are
related to the following:
2010 2009
Investments to be held in perpetuity, the
income from
which is generally available for MRMC
operations $1,328,059 $1,328,059
and programs
Beneficial interest in permanently
restricted net assets of
Muhlenberg Foundation, Inc.
3,863,421 3,725,375
Beneficial interest in perpetual
trust 2,351,775 2,205,965
Total
$ 7,543,255 $ 7,259,399
MRMC December 31,
2010 Financial Statements
Notes to Financial
Statements
December 31, 2010 and
2009
Financial Statements
– page 9 paragraph 2
Beneficial Interest
in Perpetual Trusts
2. Summary of
Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
Beneficial Interest
in Perpetual Trusts
“Pursuant to the
terms of the instruments creating such perpetual trusts, MRMC and Muhlenberg
Foundation have no legal right to direct the application of the assets and even
though these assets are reported in the accompanying consolidated balance
sheet, they are subject to the jurisdiction of the court. With the closure of
MRMC’s hospital, the perpetual trusts are all being reviewed, however, the
possible future financial effects, if any, are not presently determinable.”
Issue 7
Did Solaris Health
Systems, the
MRMC December 31,
2010 Financial Statements – page 6 paragraph 2
Notes to Financial
Statements
December 31, 2010 and
2009
Financial Statements
– page 17 last paragraph
“During 2009,
equipment including an MRI machine with an original cost of approximately
$2,200,000 and accumulated depreciation of $2,040,000 was transferred from MRMC
to
Conclusion
Has the New Jersey
Attorney General ever addressed the issue of violating the original Articles of
Incorporation, which clearly state that the sole purpose of the organization
was “to provide a hospital for the
residents of
2/20/2012 - revised 5/15/12 – 5/29/12
No comments:
Post a Comment